While we held the arrest warrant ended Fox's alleged false imprisonment, we did not hold that it necessarily extinguished all wrongful conduct such that he had no legal redress.

...

Although judicial error in granting an arrest warrant might not extinguish the improper actions of an officer, improper actions by a prosecutor can, and in this case did, "end" Fox's false imprisonment. This nuanced distinction makes sense because one could seek a remedy against a prosecutor for malicious prosecution, but there is no equivalent remedy against a judicial officer. Therefore, by allowing improper actions by a prosecutor to and a claim against an officer, claimants are not denied legal redress for an injury; their redress is simply divided in time between an officer and a prosecutor.