Journey's Account Statute Saves Case Improperly Filed with IDOI
Statute of Limitations August 4, 2011
I am on record as being less than impressed with the liberality with which Indiana's courts apply the Journey's Account Statute. (I blame my experience with Ohio's more liberal interpretation of R.C. § 2305.19, its savings statute). So I was pleasantly surprised by a decision from the Indiana Court of Appeals yesterday in Hayes v. Westminster Village North, Inc., ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App. 2011), Cause No. 49A02-1010-CT-1141, in which it applied the Journey's Account Statute to save a case from dismissal.
Lesson:
I am on record as being less than impressed with the liberality with which Indiana's courts apply the Journey's Account Statute. (I blame my experience with Ohio's more liberal interpretation of R.C. § 2305.19, its savings statute). So I was pleasantly surprised by a decision from the Indiana Court of Appeals yesterday in Hayes v. Westminster Village North, Inc., ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App. 2011), Cause No. 49A02-1010-CT-1141, in which it applied the Journey's Account Statute to save a case from dismissal.
Lesson:
- The Journey's Account Statute applies if a medical malpractice action is filed with the IDOI and the IDOI rejects the case because the defendant is not a qualified healthcare provider.
TAG IN Court of Appeals,
Journey's Account Statute,
Medical Malpractice,
Statute of Limitations,
Summary Judgment
Trackback Address :: http://www.indianalawupdate.com/trackback/250



