Categories
- 12(b)(6)
- 60(b)
- Abrogation of Common Law
- Administrative Appeals
- Agency
- All Writs Act
- Amending Pleadings
- Antitrust
- Appellate
- Arbitration
- Attorney's Fees
- Bad Faith
- Bankruptcy
- Best Evidence Rule
- Civil Rights
- Class Action
- Comparative Fault
- Constitutional Law
- Contempt
- Contracts
- Corporations
- Coverage Questions
- Declaratory Judgment
- Default Judgment
- Discovery
- Discrimination
- Dram Shop Act
- Due Process
- Duty of Agent
- Duty of Care
- Duty to Defend
- Duty to Warn
- Elections
- Employment
- Environmental Legal Action
- Equal Protection
- Estoppel
- Evidence
- Expert Testimony
- Failure to Prosecute
- Fair Debt Collection
- False Imprisonment
- Federal Jurisdiction
- FMLA
- Freedom of Religion
- General
- Guest Statute
- Hearsay
- HIPAA
- Immunity
- Ind. Law Club
- Instructions
- Insurance
- Intestate Succession
- Invasion of Privacy
- Joint and Several Liability
- Judicial Admission
- Jury Issues
- Laches
- Legal Malpractice
- Links Of The Day
- Malicious Prosecution
- Medical Malpractice
- Mortgages
- Motion to Correct Error
- Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress
- Notice of Appeal
- Notice of Claim
- Nunc Pro Tunc
- Offer of Judgment
- Particular Actions
- Personal Jurisdiction
- Postjudgment Interest
- Preemption
- Prejudgment Interest
- Premises Liability
- Privilege
- Procedure
- Proceedings Supplemental
- Product Liability
- Professional Conduct
- Property Rights
- Proximate Cause
- Recusal
- Res Judicata
- RICO
- Right to a Jury Trial
- Sales Disclosure
- Selection
- Service
- Sheriff's Sale
- Sovereign Immunity
- Speech
- Spoliation
- Statute of Limitations
- Statute of Repose
- Subject Matter Jurisdiction
- Subsequent Remedial Measures
- Summary Judgment
- Tax Sale
- Tort Claims Act
- Trade Secrets
- Trademark
- Transfer Proceedings
- Trespass
- Trusts
- Uncategorized
- Unemployment Compensation
- Unjust Enrichment
- Venue
- Wage Payment Statute
- Worker's Compensation
- Wrongful Death
-
-
Recent Posts
- Indianapolis Bar Association CLE Follow-Up
- Flat Fee Was Both Reasonable And Earned
- April 25, 2013 Indianapolis Law Club Presentation
- Business Cannot Be Penalized For Failing To Make Unemployment Contribution After It Has Moved Out Of Indiana
- Governmental Entities Do Not Have Special Status In Trademark Disputes
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- April 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- October 2009
- July 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- November 2008
- July 2008
- May 2008
- February 2008
- July 2007
- March 2007
- November 2006
- May 2006
- September 2005
- July 2005
- April 2005
- February 2005
- September 2004
- July 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- February 2004
Tag Archives: Continuance
“Excusable Neglect” Is No Excuse for Filing an Untimely Response to a Rule 56 Motion
Trial Rule 56 provides that a response to a motion for summary judgment is to be filed within 30 days after service of the motion. Attorneys who miss this deadline try to find ways around it; the attorney in Delage Laden … Continue reading
Posted in Procedure, Summary Judgment
Tagged Continuance, IN Court of Appeals, Summary Judgment
Comments Off
Always File Your 56(F) Motion
November 16, 2010 Yesterday, the Indiana Court of Appeals told a cautionary tale in Booher v. Sheeram, LLC, 937 N.E.2d 392 (Ind. Ct. App. 2010), Case No. 20A03-1005-CT-338, about an attorney who received an agreement from his opposing counsel for … Continue reading
Posted in Procedure, Summary Judgment
Tagged Continuance, IN Court of Appeals, Summary Judgment, Trial Rule 56 (F)
Comments Off